A Biogeographic Assessment off North/Central California

Analyses/Maps

Fish

California market squid HSI map: Potential Distribution
California market squid Adult HSI map

About this map:
This map displays HSI model results for adult California market squid during June-November. The maps exhibit the potential distribution of the species based on affinities to bathymetry and substrate (see graphics below maps). Predicted HSI values range in scale from 10 (highest) to 0 (unsuitable) and were grouped into five classes: highest suitability (10-8), high (7-5), moderate (4-2), lowest (1), and unsuitable (0). SI values for bathymetry and substrate type are shown in the graphics below the mapped HSI results. Model performance graphics and statistical details are displayed in the map insets.

Data Sources:
Bathymetry SI: Wilkins et al., 1998 and Lauth, 2001.
Substrate SI: Street, 1983; Maupin, 1988; CALCOFI, 1999; Leet et al., 2001; and CDFG, 2002.
Validation: Wilkins et al., 1998 and Turk et al., 2001.

Methods:
Bathymetry SI values for adult California market squid were developed using the regression fitting technique using NMFS trawl data. For more detailed descriptions of these techniques, see the discussion of Habitat Suitability Modeling, Section 2.1.2, p x.

Results and Discussion:
Length data for market squid captured in NMFS trawls were not available, thus the data most likely represent adult and juvenile individuals. Determining depth affinities by life stage from the literature was difficult, thus the two life stages are grouped together for these analyses until additional information becomes available. As such, squid depth preference was predicted to occur in nearshore waters, up to depths of 90 m. Depths greater than 190 m were considered unsuitable. No data were available for depths within 1-50 m, which is probably preferable squid habitat based on the frequency of abundance of squid landings in the 50-90 m range. Market squid are primarily pelagic; however, literature sources revealed affinity for soft substrate due to spawning activities; therefore mud and sand substrates received higher SI values than hard substrates. Mapped model results based on these SI values display the majority of highly suitable habitat in the northern region of the study area where the shelf is broader. Highly suitable habitat does exist in the southern portion; however, it is narrow in width south of Monterey Canyon. Overall, 6.4% of the study area was considered highly suitable for market squid. Within the Gulf of the Farallones sanctuary, high suitability covers almost 38% of the available habitat, while only comprising 8.7 and 10.4% of available habitat in Cordell Bank and Monterey sanctuaries, respectively.

Model performance was assessed by regressing predicted HSI values on mean abundance values from NMFS trawl samples (1998-2001). A strong positive correlation existed between predicted HSI value and mean abundance (see map inset). More information is recommended to refine SI values for both depth (i.e. 0-50 m depths) and substrate. Additional life history information is also needed to examine habitat shifts in relation to squid growth.